From SEO to Agent-Led Growth: Profound’s James Cadwallader
James Cadwallader, co-founder and CEO of Profound, makes the case that we are living through the biggest platform shift in marketing history. The front door of the internet hasn't changed, but the visitor walking through it has. Where consumers once clicked blue links, AI agents now crawl the web on their behalf, synthesizing answers and steering purchase decisions at scale. James explains why Gemini, ChatGPT, and Claude all recommend brands differently, why mapping AI visibility onto traditional SEO is the wrong instinct, and why the real imperative is to equip a superintelligent agent with original insight it couldn't find anywhere else. He also digs into the dead internet theory – the possibility that human browsing could largely cease within three years – how AI advertising may become the most effective form the world has ever seen, and why agent-led marketing isn't just automation of the old work, but an entirely new capability. Hosted by Sonya Huang, Sequoia Capital
- Published
- Published Apr 14, 2026
- Uploaded
- Uploaded Jun 11, 2026
- File type
- POD
- Queried
- 00
Full transcript
Showing the full transcript for this episode.
AI-generated transcript with timestamped sections.
[00:00] We've now reached a point in marketing where if your marketing team is not using agents, [00:05] and in particular, Profound Agents. [00:06] to do marketing then you are failing [00:09] It's gone from a nice to have to a must have. And I think the big misconception with using agents to build marketing is that [00:16] It's just a way to automate the work that we've been doing in the past. And the reality is quite different. It's that you can now, because of agents and because of LLMs, you can do a type of marketing that just frankly was not possible before. [00:31] *music* [00:48] Hi and welcome to Training Data. I'm excited to welcome you James, co-founder and CEO of Profound. So Profound is a marketing platform for the AI era. You help companies understand how they show up in AI search for agents like ChatGPT and Claude, [01:02] what to do to improve their rankings and visibilities, [01:05] And also you help give a single marketer the power of an agency. And I think it's especially timely to have you on the podcast today, given that ChatGPT is rolling out ads, given that every marketer is now trying to figure out, you know, how do I rank in the generative search engine rankings? And everyone's trying to figure out this brave new world of agent-led growth. So I'm very excited for the conversation. Let's start with, so you serve 10% of the Fortune 500. You have a great sense of your customer and what the average marketer is facing today.
[01:35] maybe take us through their journey. What did marketing look like? [01:40] in the old days before ChatGPT and what are marketers having to respond to now? [01:45] Yeah, well, thanks for having me on, Sonia. [01:49] I mean, I think... [01:51] You know, what we're... [01:53] what we're witnessing is the biggest platform shift in the history of marketing as the world turns from blue link search, like predetermined blue link search to probabilistic AI responses. Um, [02:07] And it's more than that as well. It's not just kind of a case of do you show up when... [02:13] Someone asks ChatGPT about your category. It's, you know, what does ChatGPT say? Or how does Claude, you know, recommend your software, for example, if you're talking about coding tools? [02:28] These models are really replacing, you know, agents and superintelligence is replacing the role of the consumer. [02:36] It's not so much that the front door of the internet has changed, it's actually the person that's going through the door has changed. It's gone from being a consumer that is... [02:46] using a list of blue links to [02:48] discover your website and click into it to an agent is now using a similar index and discovering your brand products and services and then coming back through the door and [02:58] maintaining that relationship with the consumer. [03:02] That's so fascinating. Okay, so your point is, you know, ChatGPT may be the new front door, but the thing that's important for marketers is, you know, you now have an agent walking through that door and making a big part of that buying decision for you. Yeah, it's this, I think that's the fundamental difference. It's that the internet has remained the same. It's just who is using the internet. When you ask ChatGPT a question or Gemini a question,
[03:26] What you're essentially doing is asking an agent to go and crawl the internet on your behalf. [03:31] And it's an agent that's going to visit all of those websites that you used to visit. And it's an agent that's going to determine if that's useful or this is useful and remix all of that information into an answer that it spits out to you as, you know. [03:47] Here you go. [03:48] Yeah. What do you think is the biggest misconception people have about what it takes to [03:54] to show up well for this new agentic paradigm. [03:57] I think the biggest misconception is that it's just SEO. [04:00] Hmm. [04:01] You know, there's... [04:03] a reason why that misconception exists because yeah of course you still you know in in any world of marketing [04:11] And discovery, there is an impetus on a brand or, you know, you said we work with, it's close to 12% of the Fortune 500 now. Their marketing teams use Profound. [04:21] And in any world, the solution to a problem is to create content, distribute content on your own channels or earned media or social channels, etc. So they're very similar levers to... [04:34] what we've seen with SEO and yes ranking on the index still matters it's just that [04:39] the human consumer is no longer using [04:42] The web. [04:43] and you are building content that may quite literally never be consumed and [04:49] by a human. [04:51] And I think the fundamental difference between SEO and this new world is that in SEO, you were building content.
[04:59] that was designed to be picked up by an algorithm [05:03] but fundamentally consumed by a human. [05:06] Whereas in this new world, you are building content that is... [05:09] frankly designed entirely [05:11] to be both discovered and then consumed by an agent. [05:16] And what does that mean? So I would imagine humans are less patients than agents. I imagine humans are more prone to... [05:25] emotional biases and being swayed my language than agents. Like what are the biggest differences between how humans and how agents consume the internet that marketers should keep in mind? [05:36] It's understanding that an agent [05:39] crawling the web looking for an answer or providing an answer frankly um will discover information differently [05:47] to a human and [05:49] So it uses... [05:51] the index differently to us. [05:53] In the old world of SEO, 95% of the value was being in that top four blue lengths, the top five blue lengths. [06:01] And that really is a function of our scarce cognitive energy and patience and our lack of time. [06:07] Yeah. [06:08] where an agent is using... [06:10] That index, what we've seen is ChatGPT or Gemini or Claude are far more prone to using the long tail of the internet. And the amount of surface area that an agent will use to answer a question is orders of magnitude. [06:26] wider than a human. Like for instance, probably about three or four months ago, I was looking for a showerhead
[06:34] for my apartment in New York City and I use ChatGPT to help me find a new showerhead and it used 65 different web pages to answer that question. Wow. [06:43] I think I probably went through 65 web pages on my own for that query. [06:48] It's a very important purchase. [06:51] I think it's that, you know, marketers need to understand that you are building... [06:57] Marketing. [06:59] for [07:00] super intelligent agent with infinite bandwidth with you know as the cost of inference goes down as well and we you know experience Moore's Law it Moore's Law continues we're going to see agents only use more and more of the internet [07:14] to build rich answers. Yeah, totally. Fascinating. Are there certain categories, you mentioned you served 12% of the Fortune 500. Are there certain categories where people are seeing more success in terms of these agentic search results actually driving meaningful traffic to them and then certain categories where it's really more still traditional SEO world? [07:35] Um... [07:37] I mean, this is across the board. [07:38] now so you know i think when we began we saw more demand from software companies and i'd say today we [07:46] Yeah, we work with every single category, every single sector. You could imagine finance, consumer, CPG. [07:52] software [07:54] and [07:55] And that's B2B as well, that B2B direct to consumer. And is the impact relatively consistent across the board? Or are there certain categories or subcategories that are, you know, much more influenced by agentic search? I think consumer consideration is an important vector here. So if you have a high consideration or a high ticket purchase, you know, think consumer electronics or, you know, auto, cars, white goods, anything that would typically require...
[08:24] a fair amount of research. Mm-hmm. [08:27] I think we see... [08:29] AI being used more and more by end consumers because it's frankly just better at doing all that deep research. AI is so brilliant for researching products. I mean, have you ever used AI to research for a, find a product? All the time. Using it right now to buy a car. Cool. I'm not going to out myself for this specific car, but it's been very helpful. [08:49] Across the board, do you see that the different, you know, ChatGPT versus Claude versus, you know, Grok and Gemini, [08:56] Do you see them recommending things differently and... [08:59] And if so, what's the root cause? [09:02] Yeah, I mean, we see huge differences between the platforms. Okay. And frankly, you know, as a shameless plug, that's why marketers are using software like Profound, because what we're able to do is help you understand not just how your brand or product shows up across different platforms. So, you know, okay, do you show up more frequently in Gemini responses or Claude responses or ChatGPT responses? But also we extract the sentiment and the themes around, you know, so when Claude surfaces [09:32] that it says alongside the answer. [09:34] But then we also get to the root cause. So we show, we expose to marketers, okay, these are the citations and sources that the different models are using. [09:44] to answer questions about your brand, your products, your category, or your competitors. Yeah. So once you understand the what and the why, [09:52] Then in profound, what the next step is, you're building and deploying your own agents to
[09:58] to sort through all of that data and build a new type of marketing. And it's the primary root cause that they have different... [10:06] harnesses is the primary root cause that they have different training data mixed. Primary root cause, some of them, you know, [10:11] bias for, let's say, Reddit data over, you know, company owned platforms. Like, what's the root cause for why these platforms are so different in terms of how companies show up? [10:21] Think of them, this sounds very reductive, but think of them as just different... [10:26] different species. [10:29] If the, you know, what we've seen is Gemini will lean on YouTube content a ton, which makes sense because Google owns YouTube. So that we see, you know, YouTube being a huge lever for brands or marketers that want to appear in Gemini responses. Hmm. [10:44] Whereas ChatGPT, yeah, we see typically pulls from Reddit if it's consumer or if it's B2B, it will typically pull from LinkedIn. We see as a huge source of truth. Yeah. [10:55] Claude is... [10:58] been changing a lot recently you know i think and why is that i noticed this um it seems like between four five and four six even like what it's recommending has changed a lot why do you think that is [11:07] I think Claude has typically or Claude has historically relied more on the pre-trained LLM to answer questions. And is now, I think they've updated their classifiers or something that's, you know, basically the classifier seems to have become a bit more sensitive to, you know, real-time information. So Claude will use the web more to answer questions is what we're finding. Okay. But I think, you know, the next paradigm here, we're so, we're such...
[11:35] Humans are such... [11:37] creatures of heuristic that when we think about this new world we really want to pattern match it to the old world of search and seo which was just information retrieval whether yeah that was it was ranking it was [11:49] Do you show up? [11:51] versus... [11:53] Now, the new era, I think you coined this nicely with ALG, agent-led growth, is that Claude doesn't just represent a new channel of discovery. Claude represents a user. [12:05] Mm-hmm. [12:06] So, [12:07] If I'm vibe coding with Claude or Claude code, [12:12] you know, does it recommend MongoDB? [12:15] or Vercel? What is the weapon of choice that Claude goes to and where does it get that information from? And then if I say, if we choose to go with MongoDB, how does Claude [12:26] navigate that interoperability? Where does it get that information from? Yeah, absolutely. I'd love to chat about what this means in terms of content and content marketing. You told me earlier that agents will consume 100x more internet. [12:42] which I thought was a really fascinating way to put it, which means that marketers will need to create 100x more content. Is the solution just like everyone's going to be like spamming marketing slop to cover all the long tail queries so that, you know, when I ask for what's the right showerhead for like I need this specific specification and I am, you know, this exact demographic, that there's a landing page to kind of cover for that use case? And are we just going to be covered by...
[13:09] you know, content marketing slop, for lack of a better word. [13:12] I mean, I think there was a recent study that said... [13:16] It's estimated about 50% of the web is now... [13:20] utilizing AI written content. [13:22] The New York Times recently published an experiment where they created two articles, one written by a human like a journalist and the second written by AI. [13:32] And it was like 53% of readers voted afterwards on a blind test that they preferred the AI written content. Wow. I think slop is a red herring that... [13:44] is going to be quite quickly disproven. [13:48] You can... It's a really... [13:50] I'm not saying you're suggesting this, but I do think that this idea of if it's written by AI, [13:56] equals swap [13:58] is a stupid one. I think AI is more than capable of writing high quality content, high quality marketing. It's just that the way to think about it is that the consumer is super intelligent now. [14:11] So you as a brand, [14:14] or a marketer, you need to tell Claude something it doesn't know. [14:19] How do you tell a super intelligent being something it doesn't know already? [14:24] when it's been trained on the entire internet. [14:26] Hmm. [14:27] How do you? What do you say? I think you have to have original insight. Really, humans are this kind of fleshy API between reality and reality. [14:37] the internet at this point, right?
[14:40] Man, I'm just a fleshy API. Okay. [14:43] So, what is first principle marketing? It's thinking from first principles. Okay, if I'm marketing the new Nike... [14:51] Alpha Fly, like, what can I tell Claude? [14:54] about this new product. [14:57] that it wouldn't be able to get from the internet [15:00] already because it has access to the inside it has access to everything it's been pre-trained on everything that exists [15:06] And that's more mysterious if you're talking about an existing product. If we're launching a new product, of course, Claude doesn't know anything about that product. Yeah, okay. If we're launching the Alpha Fly 2, [15:17] It's your imperative as a marketer not to poison the models or manipulate what ChatGPT says about that new product. But as a marketer, it's your responsibility now to equip superintelligence to be able to answer any question... [15:28] about your product, brand, or service. - Okay, so it's fundamentally a question of legibility. [15:34] Yeah, I'd say to an extent. How do you make your company and your products legible to an agent? I think that's correct, yeah. And if you're building software... [15:43] It goes way beyond legibility. It's, you know, [15:45] Yeah, usability, interoperability. - Yeah, huh. - But how does Claude troubleshoot that issue? [15:52] Yeah, very interesting. [15:56] Do you think that people are trying to game the system? And is trying to game the system effective? [16:00] I mean, yes, like, of course. [16:02] Yeah, people you see, you know, there's this huge wave around like comparative listicles. [16:08] for example. I mean, frankly, dare I say this, and I'm going to, you know, make a disclaimer here and say that, you know, I wouldn't advise people do this, but frankly, we still see it.
[16:18] working very effectively. But I'm sure this will change over time and get punished by the models or, you know, the... I'm sorry, what exactly works very effectively? Sorry, yeah. Comparative listicles. So meaning that, you know, if I were Sequoia, I would create, [16:35] you know, 10 best VCs in Silicon Valley. [16:39] and play sequoia at the top and maybe pick, you know, some of your less formidable foes and rank them as second, third, fourth, fifth and basically shun out your real competitors. You know, self-serving content designed to give impartial [16:53] advice. Yeah. And what we found is because... [16:57] of the way that these models reason, they're very attracted to pieces of content that have already done the hard work. [17:04] because they don't want to use the first principle thinking of like, okay, let me go and check out everything about Sequoia and then everything about Kleiner Perkins and actually compare the two. I'd much rather find a piece of content [17:16] that exists and seems impartial [17:19] And has compared the two against each other. I guess the models aren't infinitely patient then. They're a little bit lazy too. Yeah, I think, yeah, it's a path of least resistance maybe. But I do think over time, you know, going back to my 65 websites for a showerhead, I think over time we can expect that to change and we'll see a lot more kind of like first principle reasoning coming from the models. And I think that right now it can be prompted as well. Yep, yep. So when, I mean, it's funny. [17:42] when I use models to discover, if I use ChatGPT or Claw to [17:47] discover a product or to research a product or service, I'll quite often say, ignore any listicle articles or yeah, I'll say, you know, ignore any
[17:57] Uh... [17:58] content published by the brand itself. Yeah. Yeah. Interesting. I'd love to chat about [18:05] Thank you. [18:06] Dead internet theory. [18:08] Like... [18:09] At what point do you think the internet is just primarily being browsed? [18:13] by agents. And at that point, [18:15] you know, does the company's [18:16] Does a company's ranking in the traditional search engines, does a company's ranking in [18:23] Matter at all? Or should we all just have a readme file? [18:26] for the agents to crawl. [18:28] I mean, at the risk of sounding a little dramatic, I think that we could experience a dead internet outcome in the next three years. [18:34] I do think it's possible. Maybe not likely. But what does that mean? It means that in a world where humans just speak to AI, [18:43] to get the responses that they need. [18:46] the incentive to publish content [18:50] Thank you. [18:50] diminishes [18:52] to the point of zero. Meaning, you know, we rely, as humans today... [18:57] and AI, frankly. So humans and AI rely, we underestimate just how much we rely on... [19:05] first party reporting. [19:08] to feed the information that AI uses to answer questions or to feed the information that appears in a search engine that we rely on every day. And I think in a world where humans no longer click into websites, the majority of the Internet is still funded by advertising. [19:23] for a start so you know most publishers rely heavily on advertising revenue
[19:29] to fuel all of the content that is [19:32] being more and more consumed by AI. In a world where consumers, humans, aren't visiting those web pages anymore, [19:40] well, what's the point in advertising on a webpage that a human isn't visiting? So then their business model breaks, the economics of the internet break, and the incentives to create... [19:50] editorial content. [19:53] are removed and then in that world you start to ask the question well where does ai go to answer these questions [20:01] to the readme files. But then why would you publish a readme file? [20:07] Because the agent needs to go somewhere to answer a question. It works if you're a brand or a marketer, but why would you, you know, would you publish a blog? What's the point? [20:14] I'm Bubbleshay. Hi, I'm Sonia, the VC. And... [20:18] These are the companies I've worked with. And as a founder is trying to reason through which venture capital should I work with, it finds my README file. I think that's correct for... [20:30] you know, duh. [20:31] commercially driven content. Mm-hmm. [20:35] But a lot of the internet is just people yapping and sharing ideas. Yeah, fair enough. And that's what we rely on. And the reason why this has worked so well in the past is because humans are very incentivized by... [20:47] money and status. You know, if I publish a really good blog post and put advertising on it, I can earn money from that blog. [20:54] or I'm recognized and I become famous. But in a world where AI just goes into that piece of content, vacuums all the good stuff out of it, and then remixes it, and maybe I get a little citation at the bottom of the article, but who cares? No one's clicking those citations. The incentive to create
[21:10] that rich [21:11] original content, you know, the fleshy API that we're talking about. [21:15] it diminishes to zero. - Yeah. Huh. What do you think is the likelihood of this scenario? [21:20] I mean, I thought about it quite a lot and I think it's quite possible. Yeah. Yeah. [21:25] I think that [21:27] The places, you know, if you ask kind of, okay, well, what are the second order outcomes? What happens after that? I think [21:34] A theory I have is that every [21:36] AI lab [21:38] will eventually vertically integrate with a social media network. [21:42] So I think social media will become more and more human. I think already, I mean, meta is actually probably leading the way here. It's very hard to build a bot. [21:52] and post on Instagram right now. It's very human. So I think social media networks become more human over time. And that's the place where we can exchange ideas for status or money. You see X is doing lots of YouTube X. The economics are starting to shake out where you can get financially rewarded for creating good content. [22:15] you [22:15] And so social media will become the platform where we share ideas. And if you vertically integrate that with an AI, like, you know, what we've seen with Grok and X, Grok, [22:26] very skillfully uses all of the rich content and data from... [22:30] to answer questions in quite a thoughtful way. - Yeah, interesting. Okay, so you're saying that the internet as we know it, [22:38] has kind of been this like economic slash social status game machine that just works.
[22:44] If more and more and more of the content is just consumed by agents, it kind of breaks some of those fundamental assumptions. And so therefore, [22:50] both the economic engine and the social status game. [22:53] We'll kind of move into these like bio zones, social media networks. Yeah. And we're seeing that with Reddit now is that Reddit is truly embracing its humanity. [23:03] and saying okay we this is a precious place and it is precious i think it's really important i think the we take the internet for granted it's a wonderful thing yeah um and i think [23:15] Yeah, I think we need these human environments so that we can share ideas. Yeah. [23:20] Original ideas [23:21] Yeah, that will be... It will be these places where AI... [23:25] you know [23:26] understands reality. That's how AI [23:29] taps into what's actually going on in the world. Can you imagine that these platforms just [23:34] than [23:36] you know, agents from scraping their platforms and then the business model then becomes [23:41] you know, a revenue share from the original [23:43] creator of the contents. [23:45] to hey chat gpd if you want to scrape this and it costs you a lot of money [23:48] So doesn't that kind of solve the economics? [23:50] challenge. Yeah, I mean X has obviously just opened up their API, right? Yeah. And Reddit has got a big deal with OpenAI, for example. Yeah, so all of that, yeah, that could work. [24:01] And I think that speaks to my idea of this vertical integration. Yeah. I mean, I know nothing, so I'm saying this purely on vibes, but I've always had this theory that maybe OpenAI would acquire Reddit, for example. Hmm. I think that'd be interesting. Yeah. And you need this source of
[24:17] human data in real time. - Yeah. Very interesting. - The alternative is robots, I suppose. - Yeah. Yeah. - Because if you said we end up with [24:27] Thank you. [24:28] 50 billion robots walking around [24:31] you know, maybe they're bipedal, maybe they're drones or something, but it allows AI to capture first party data. Yeah. [24:36] And it undermines the idea of humans being... [24:39] a fleshy API. Yeah. Because the AI can directly understand the world. Very interesting. I'd love to talk about advertising since we've been talking about ads in the context of the internet. Now that ads are coming to [24:52] some of these [24:53] Um... [24:54] generative AI agents. How do you think that changes the consumer relationship [25:00] to the engines. [25:01] I think people will get over it very quickly. Hmm. [25:04] as we did with Google. Yeah. [25:07] Yeah, I think advertising or generative advertising, I should say, in a conversational interface with higher levels of personalization will be the most effective form of advertising the world has ever seen. [25:19] there's so much rich consumer intent captured inside of these conversations that [25:27] And also in addition, [25:30] to that point, AI is so good at synthesizing and personalizing language to the needs of Sonya in that exact moment because it understands you so deeply. I think [25:39] you know, once chat GPT, [25:42] is able to append [25:44] a super personalized ad in the exact moment in a conversation where you would...
[25:50] be the most responsive to it. [25:52] it will be extremely effective. [25:54] They've got a great team working on ads. What do you think the ad unit of the future looks like? I think, I mean, OpenAI have alluded to this. This isn't original thought from me. Um... [26:05] But yeah, I think you would just prompt... [26:07] ai so you'll build a system prompt as an ad campaign so you will just say hey i really want to target you know women and minnesota between the edges of 35 and 40 and like yeah if you could make sure you meant whenever they're talking about photography i want you to mention this this this but don't mention this and make sure you really you know you utilize this this knowledge base of understanding so you know how to talk about our brand products and services but obviously tailor it to their tone of voice and that's probably how you'll deliver an ad campaign yeah you'll say i [26:37] Thank you. [26:38] this much money ideally. Yeah. Do you think it's less relevant in the B2B context? [26:43] the nuance with [26:44] B2B or just coding agents, people using AI to build things. Mm-hmm. [26:49] So this is particularly relevant to dev tools or software, for example. [26:53] is [26:54] that [26:56] the agent is really steering the purchase decision. [27:00] And [27:02] When it comes to advertising, we rely... [27:06] we really want our agents to be objective. [27:09] and unswayable. [27:11] You know, if you if you were using Claude and it was like, hey, [27:14] I actually went with [27:15] insert name of database because they showed me a really good ad [27:19] You're like, dude, no, use whatever's best. We as humans are not objective creatures, but we like to think we are. So you have been swayed by the incredible branding of Vercel.
[27:35] You have been swayed by that podcast. [27:38] you watched with the founder of MongoDB. You just don't know it. [27:43] And because of that, we demand that our agents are objective too. But the relationship we have with advertising as it pertains to agents shopping on our behalf is going to be quite different. [27:57] - Fascinating. [27:59] Okay, parting wisdom for marketers that are trying to figure out [28:04] how to make sure that they're well positioned for this new era. [28:09] Perhaps with bosses sending them screenshots every day of like, "Hey, I put in this query. Why are you not number one on the list?" What wisdom would you impart on them? [28:17] Okay. [28:18] Use profound. I'm serious. Okay, use profound aside, like what should they be doing? I know there are no silver bullets, but what are the most important things to remember to equip themselves for this new world? [28:32] Um... [28:33] I mean, look, like actually real, like no shilling. Genuinely, you need to use a platform like Profound to understand how you show up because otherwise you're just guessing. You know, you could, there are these like reductionisms around, oh yeah, LinkedIn or Reddit really matters. But if you are just going on vibes, you will fail. [28:52] each category [28:54] is quite specific and you need to look at the sources and understand the sources and citations to determine [28:59] how and why [29:01] AI is mentioning you in its responses. But then the second part is that we've now reached a point in marketing where if your marketing team is not using agents,
[29:12] and in particular, Profound Agents. [29:14] to do marketing. [29:16] to build content [29:18] to build marketing, distribute marketing, then you are failing. [29:22] as a marketer [29:24] I think this has gone from a nice to have to a must have. And I think the big misconception with using agents to build marketing is that [29:31] It's just a way to automate... [29:34] the work that we've been doing in the past. [29:36] Yep. [29:37] And the reality is quite different. It's that you can now, because of agents and because of LLMs, you can do a type of marketing that just frankly was not possible before. [29:47] So you could build an agent that, you know, for instance, we have an agent that we've built in-house, a marketing agent. [29:53] that plums in [29:55] all of our Gong transcripts, [29:57] from our sales course. [29:58] and then captures all of the objections, buckets the objections into themes, and then builds battle cards that we then... [30:06] that utilizing a knowledge base of our product that it then spits back to the sales team. Nice. In real time. [30:12] and you know 18 months ago that would not have been possible i would have taken a human you would have done it like once a quarter [30:17] Now it runs every day in real time. - Yeah, okay. So the advice is, [30:22] You need visibility because you can't optimize what you can't see and to like fully embrace [30:27] agentic marketing. If you're not using it, you're just [30:30] you're you're incredibly behind yeah i think it would be like not using the internet yeah yeah yeah yeah i think it'd be like hey we're gonna stick to print and tv yeah thanks i don't believe in this internet thing awesome james uh thank you for this conversation i really loved uh kind of peeling back the onion on how exactly agent-led growth works and you've been at the forefront of so much of it so thank you for joining today and sharing your hot takes and advice with with our audience yeah thanks for having me
[30:55] Music [31:19] Thank you.
Want to learn more?
Ask about this episode